Is an Installment Contract for Buying and Selling a Home Possible Without a Mortgage?

This is a common query, even though the answer should be self-evident. There is a buyer and a seller, just as in any other transaction. One party is the buyer, and the other is the seller if we use an installment contract to lengthen the time between the exchange and the completion of the sale. That’s the answer, but let’s dig deeper into why this is even a question.

Investors in real estate often ask this because they want to do both, i.e., sign a contract to buy and offer a contract to sell. If it seems counterintuitive, the investor’s ultimate goal is to get a return on their money while helping the seller and buyer out.

In 2007, Rick Otton and I introduced the idea of using purchase and sale option agreements to avoid taking legal title to a property to make a profit. Those with a firm grasp of these basics, like Donald Trump, can build formidable fortunes.

When Rick Otton and I assembled the UK documentation, we thought, “What are we trying to achieve?” Why not look into other options if the goal was to help a seller sell a home they were having trouble moving? An installment purchase agreement and a subsequent installment selling agreement could be necessary.

A more straightforward option would be to work with the seller to draft a single installment arrangement covering both parties. In any case, we’ll be able to accomplish our goals with fewer steps and fewer transactions. We, as investors, have the power and safety to profit without making any purchases in our names. The owner and purchaser will negotiate and finalize the sale terms directly.

Due to the novelty of the situation, it may be too much, too soon for the average British solicitor who has only ever handled property sales via title exchange to handle two deals at once. While the United Kingdom is still in its developmental stages compared to other Western countries like the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, the joint venture approach may be more practically viable.

During this economic downturn, I believe market forces will require all parties to come to the table to allow real estate to be bought and sold without the need to replace any underlying mortgage. When you take a step back and consider all the bureaucratic hoops that must be jumped through to get a new mortgage, it becomes clear that exchanging one mortgage for another makes no sense.

There are probably some homeowners in the world right now who, without this option, would be forced to sell their homes for pennies on the dollar. What if the investor in the middle buys out the mortgage so that they may walk away without further obligation? In most cases, the bank doesn’t mind who pays the mortgage as long as they get paid.

The rising incidence of foreclosures could be slowed if we could convince would-be homebuyers that there is more than one acceptable route to the property ladder. What with all the first-time buyers who can’t afford entry-level homes, there should also be a crisis on the other side of the property ladder. The method I’ve detailed here, known as “repossession,” can assist in easing the suffering caused by the current financial system.

David Lee has worked in finance, banking, recruitment, transportation, public utilities, and, since 2002, real estate, where he has developed business solutions to systems. David has learned from and collaborated with some of the most successful business tycoons, including global property expert Rick Otton. He has contributed to creating cash-flow property systems tailored to the needs of UK investors.

David is at the forefront of how you can profit from his extensive experience in property investing, or business systems development is areas of interest to you.

To access David’s online portfolio, go to:

Read also: Ending Foreclosure – No Matter How Awful The Situation